These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651347)

  • 1. Minnesota's "crack baby" law: weapon of war or link in a chain?
    Johnson JM
    Law Inequal; 1990 Jul; 8(3):485-531. PubMed ID: 11651347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
    Flannery MT
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
    Dobson T; Eby KK
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
    Goldberg S
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond survival: the procreative rights of women with HIV.
    Boockvar K
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1994; 14(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11652889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
    Gallagher J
    Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
    Levy JK
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.