These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651347)
21. Substance abuse during pregnancy. Moss K Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy. Myers JE Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty. Johnsen D Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery? Blickenstaff DC Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law. Peach LJ J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand. Tateishi SA Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care? Phelan JP South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings. Moss KL Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy. Mayo TW Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away. Swenson VJ; Crabbe C St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Two patients or one? Problems of consent in obstetrics. Miller L Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 11659741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity. Finer JJ Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Adventures in babysitting: gestational surrogate mother tort liability. Bussel KA Duke Law J; 1991 Dec; 41(3):661-90. PubMed ID: 11659580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting. Sturgess RH Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]