These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651347)

  • 41. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
    Goldberg S
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
    Tolton C
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A pregnant woman's decision to decline treatment: how should the law respond?
    Seymour J
    J Law Med; 1994 Aug; 2(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 11660250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A delicate condition.
    Andrews LB
    Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?
    Locke NJ
    Houst Law Rev; 1987 May; 24(3):549-76. PubMed ID: 11649225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Legal frameworks to prevent harm in-utero.
    Bewley S
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 11652958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
    Persels J
    J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Wide appeal filed on forced Caesarean delivery.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are we outlawing motherhood for HIV-infected women?
    Isaacman SH
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):479-96. PubMed ID: 11651346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Canadian court reaffirms reproductive rights.
    Kondro W
    Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):816. PubMed ID: 11654509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
    Goldblatt AD
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 11657466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
    Grant I
    Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Protecting fetuses from prenatal hazards: whose crimes? what punishment?
    Nolan K
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11650907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Maternal-fetal ethical dilemmas: a guideline for physicians.
    Miller FH
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11651353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.
    Healy P
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.