These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651353)
21. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity. Finer JJ Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument. Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Judicial intervention in pregnancy. Martin S; Coleman M McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension. Dawson TB Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery? Knopoff KA Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Courts acting to force care of the unborn. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life. Tauer CA Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy. Hanigsberg JE Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences. Shepherd L Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand. Tateishi SA Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women. Scott C Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections. Dyer C BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus. Paris JJ Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Court-ordered caesarian sections: in whose interests? Stern K Mod Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 56(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 11652316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women. Levy JK J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]