583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651354)
1. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Withholding and withdrawing life support.
Raffin TA
Hosp Pract; 1991 Mar; 26(3):133-136, 140-141, 145. PubMed ID: 11652589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
Franklin C; Weil MH
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues and terminal management of the old old.
Hesse KA
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1995; 28(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 11654994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go".
Snider GL
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Feb; 151(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 11654310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment.
Mead AP
Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Helping the hopelessly ill.
Landsman RM
Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Dying patients: who's in control?
Childress JF
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 11644392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
