These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy. Ewing C; Rowland R Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 11650919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. Massie AM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is women's labor a commodity? Anderson ES Philos Public Aff; 1990; 19(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 11651966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations. Shapiro MH Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legislative regulation of surrogacy and reproductive technology. Shultz MM Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 11655178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers. Rush SE Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies. Thom M Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives. Mies M Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogate gestator: a new and honorable profession. Ingram JD Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76(4):675-99. PubMed ID: 11656585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The case against enforcement of surrogacy contracts. Field MA Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11650311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Shultz MM Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In defense of enforcement of the surrogate contract: a reply to Field. Hill JL Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 11656633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Destabilizing thoughts on surrogacy legislation. Ikemoto LC Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):633-45. PubMed ID: 11655180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]