These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651382)
1. Regulating "the artificial family": an Austrian compromise. Bernat E J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 11651382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards a new legal regulation of medically assisted reproduction: the Austrian approach. Bernat E Med Law; 1992; 11(7-8):547-55. PubMed ID: 1302773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Austrian law on procreative medicine. Morgan D; Bernat E Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Nov; No. 83():13-6. PubMed ID: 11651517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers? Bernat E; Straka U J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378). Spain Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel. Shapira A Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988. Spain Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetus in Germany: the Fetus Protection Law of 12.13.1990. Deutsch E J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 11651385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive technology: in Israel, law, religious orthodoxy, and reproductive technologies. Shapira A Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S12-4. PubMed ID: 11644021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering. Rozovsky LE Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization. Andrews LB Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]