These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651389)
21. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum? Serratelli A George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology. Smith GP; Iraola R Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Surrogate parenthood: finding a North Carolina solution. Bartlett KT North Carol Centr Law J; 1989; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism. Brandel A MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws. Appleton SF Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Commercial conceptions: a breeding ground for surrogacy. O'Brien S North Carol Law Rev; 1986 Nov; 65(1):127-53. PubMed ID: 11658797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Williams HE Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Whose child is this? Lacayo R Time; 1987 Jan; 129(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 11653748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Baby M: catalyst for family law reform? Wadlington WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():1-20. PubMed ID: 11645619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The surrogate mother--a growing problem. Sappideen C Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]