These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651439)
1. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients. Robertson JA Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to death. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die. Delaney JJ Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin? Lomasky LE Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Ronzetti TA Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan. Hoffmann DE Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die. Mehrle JP North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Nancy Cruzan case. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J; Avila D Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]