BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651440)

  • 1. Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    Healey JM; Dowling KL
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):989-1005. PubMed ID: 11651440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
    Howard JJ
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
    Potts J
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
    Martin PA; Lagod ML
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cells for sale.
    Stone J
    Discover; 1988 Aug; 9(8):33-9. PubMed ID: 11650025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.
    Prowda JB
    J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1995 Aug; 77(8):611-39. PubMed ID: 11658094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
    O'Connor JJ
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(1):115-69. PubMed ID: 11659354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ruling renews fears of limits on research.
    Reinhold R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():19. PubMed ID: 11646695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public policy symposium: the legal, ethical, and economic impact of patient material used for product development in the biomedical industry.
    Royston I; Wagner AB; Caplan AL; Rosenberg LE
    Clin Res; 1985 Oct; 33(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 11643828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: extending the doctrine of informed consent.
    Perley SN
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 May; 67(2):335-65. PubMed ID: 11659626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bailment and donation of parts of the human body.
    Brahams D
    New Law J; 1989 Jun; 139(6411):803-4. PubMed ID: 11650943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1988 Jul; 249():494-540. PubMed ID: 11648571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second thoughts about U.S. Patent #4,438,032.
    Burrows B
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():11-4. PubMed ID: 11655049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Seattle man vents his spleen against those who would use it for profit.
    Carlson P; Pilcher J
    People (Chicago); 1985 Sep; 23(13):97, 100. PubMed ID: 11653641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    LoBiondo AR
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
    Hardiman R
    UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
    Hartman RG
    J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human tissue: rights in the body and its parts.
    Dworkin G; Kennedy I
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(3):291-319. PubMed ID: 11656860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters.
    Daar JF
    Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
    Biagi KG
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.