These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651453)

  • 21. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Furnish HA
    Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
    Keville TD
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
    Miller FH
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
    Siegel R
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fathers and fetuses.
    Davis DL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A27. PubMed ID: 11646240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reaffirming a need to reexamine paternal responsibilities to the fetus.
    Losco J; Shublak M
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Aug; 13(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 11654649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
    Phillips M
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fertility may be hazardous to your job.
    Rosenfeld A
    Saturday Rev; 1979 Apr; 6(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 11660935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. HIV, women, and access to clinical trials: tort liability and lessons from DES.
    Mastroianni AC
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):167-91. PubMed ID: 11979601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex, drugs, pregnancy, and the law: rethinking the problems of pregnant women who use drugs.
    Oberman M
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):505-48. PubMed ID: 11652105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
    Gorenberg H; White A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unraveling compromise.
    Olsen F
    Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fetal abuse: culpable behavior by pregnant women or parental immunity?
    Smith GP
    J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 11652567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.