309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651461)
1. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
Phillips M
Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory.
McGinnis DM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
Dobson T; Eby KK
St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
Martin S; Coleman M
McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When is a woman's body not her own? According to law, when she's pregnant.
Scutt JA
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11651332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
Moss KL
Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
Manson R; Marolt J
Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The social construction of personhood.
Burkhart J
Soc Thought; 1989; 15():2-13. PubMed ID: 11659411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
Goldberg S
Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
Goldberg S
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal rights? It depends.
Doudera AE
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion: the father's rights.
Gilbert RA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex, drugs, pregnancy, and the law: rethinking the problems of pregnant women who use drugs.
Oberman M
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):505-48. PubMed ID: 11652105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
