These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651461)
21. Lack of consent although informed: fetal neglect. Reece SA; Reece EA Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 11649199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. When becoming pregnant is a crime. Paltrow LM Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11650910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy. Hanigsberg JE Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy. Janssen ND Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Substance abuse during pregnancy. Moss K Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection. Siegel R Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights. Crockett KG; Hyman M Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Fetal abuse: culpable behavior by pregnant women or parental immunity? Smith GP J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 11652567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights? Gallagher J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases. Klasing MS Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse. Flannery MT J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]