These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651461)

  • 41. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Myers JE
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
    Dougherty CJ
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The ACLU philosophy and the right to abuse the unborn.
    Johnson PE
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11650911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Women and fetus: the social construction of conflict.
    Chavkin W
    Women Crim Justice; 1992; 3(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 11656335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal abuse: an exploration of emerging philosophic, legal, and policy issues.
    Losco J
    West Polit Q; 1989 Jun; 42(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 11659161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime?
    Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V
    Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Personality in Illinois prenatal tort law.
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):603-16. PubMed ID: 11665193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neglect of the unborn child: an analysis based on law in the United States.
    Bross DC; Meredyth A
    Child Abuse Negl; 1979; 3(Part 2):643-50. PubMed ID: 11658678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
    Cook M
    Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A delicate condition.
    Andrews LB
    Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
    Kolner SJ
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Arming the pregnancy police: more outlandish concoctions?
    Parness JA
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):427-48. PubMed ID: 11657119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Criminal liability for fetal endangerment: editor's introduction.
    Kleinig J
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11650906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.