These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651478)

  • 1. New reproductive technologies: a second report from Argentina.
    Sommer SE
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 11651478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology?
    Bercovitch J
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New reproductive technologies and legal reform.
    Roach SL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11650410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
    Varela MJ; Stolcke V
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New reproductive technologies in India: a print media analysis.
    Lingam L
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 11649278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unauthorized embryo transfer at the University of California, Irvine Center for Reproductive Health.
    Kakkar S
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):1015-33. PubMed ID: 11657284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
    Field M
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
    Lorio KV
    LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Austrian law on procreative medicine.
    Morgan D; Bernat E
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Nov; No. 83():13-6. PubMed ID: 11651517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too many parents.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 11656766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Williams HE
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The marketing of the new reproductive technologies: medicine, the media, and the idea of progress.
    Raymond JG
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 11650967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suffer the children: nostalgia, contradiction and the new reproductive technologies.
    Dolgin JL
    Ariz State Law J; 1996; 28(2):473-542. PubMed ID: 11657534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns.
    Kanno N
    Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex, drugs, pregnancy, and the law: rethinking the problems of pregnant women who use drugs.
    Oberman M
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):505-48. PubMed ID: 11652105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988.
    Spain
    Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reflections on abortion: a roll of the dice in Louisiana.
    Colker R
    SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46():47-55. PubMed ID: 11656276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Off the pedestal and onto the block? Motherhood, reproductive technologies, and the Canadian state.
    Brodribb S
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):407-23. PubMed ID: 11651096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.