These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651491)
1. The history of institutional review boards. Sherman M; Van Vleet JD Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern. Gordon B; Prentice E IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials. Gordon VM; Sugarman J; Kass N IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New initiative to accredit all institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11658058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories. McGough H IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research. Levine RJ Perspect Biol Med; 1980 Pt 2): S99-S114, Winter; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J; Levine RJ IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making. Cohen JM; Hedberg WB J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 May; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health. Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional animal care and use committees. Britt DP ATLA Abstr; 1986 Mar; 13(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 11649839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]