These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651503)

  • 1. Proximate personhood as a standard for making difficult treatment decisions: imperiled newborns as a case study.
    Walters JW
    Bioethics; 1992 Jan; 6(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 11651503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues of life and death: a review article.
    Rowntree S
    Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):449-64. PubMed ID: 11649634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life, death and the handicapped newborn: a review of the ethical issues.
    Higginson R
    Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11651894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infanticide for the handicapped newborn--a secular rejection.
    Davis A
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Dec; 14(4):223. PubMed ID: 11644342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approaches to ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Walters JW
    Am J Dis Child; 1988 Aug; 142(8):825-30. PubMed ID: 3394674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peter Singer on euthanasia.
    Pauer-Studer H
    Monist; 1993 Apr; 76(2):135-57. PubMed ID: 11656945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Must the bearer of a right have the concept of that to which he has a right?
    Stevens JC
    Ethics; 1984 Oct; 95(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 11651787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engelhardt on the abortion and euthanasia of defective infants.
    Jones GE
    Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 11653532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn.
    Roy DJ
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis.
    Wood AT
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective nontreatment and spina bifida: a case study in ethical theory and application.
    Johnson PR
    Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(2):91-111. PubMed ID: 11645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who shall live? who shall die? who shall play God? Some reflections on euthanasia.
    Derr P
    Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):422-37. PubMed ID: 11649632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Termination of medical treatment: the setting of moral limits from infancy to old age.
    Walter JJ
    Relig Stud Rev; 1990 Oct; 16(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 11659701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby's sad life highlights cost of futile care.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Oct; ():A1, B7. PubMed ID: 11647949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tooley's immodest proposal: Abortion and Infanticide.
    Sommers CH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 11643787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Yes, the baby should live.
    Davis A
    New Sci; 1985 Oct; 108(1480):54. PubMed ID: 11655713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities.
    HarveyParedes T
    SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46(3):805-40. PubMed ID: 11659757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.