These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Medical treatment: the mother's rights. Bridgeman J Family Law; 1993 Sep; 23():534-5. PubMed ID: 11657220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wide appeal filed on forced Caesarean delivery. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting. Sturgess RH Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Judge misled over call for caesarean operation. Dyer C BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7131):574. PubMed ID: 11645034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections. Dyer C BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A child is born in court case over caesarean. Terry D N Y Times Web; 1993 Dec; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question. Levine EM Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend? Michalowski S Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Caesarean sections by court order. Brahams D Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):770. PubMed ID: 8813981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Feb; 274():457-62. PubMed ID: 12041308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. UK woman wins right to refuse caesarean section. Ramsay S Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9114):1499. PubMed ID: 11655349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mama vs. fetus. Hornick HL Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. From cannibalism to caesareans: two conceptions of fundamental rights. Hasnas J Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1995; 89(3):900-41. PubMed ID: 11660128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]