These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651514)

  • 1. Court orders caesarean section.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Oct; No. 82():3-4. PubMed ID: 11651514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical treatment: the mother's rights.
    Bridgeman J
    Family Law; 1993 Sep; 23():534-5. PubMed ID: 11657220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wide appeal filed on forced Caesarean delivery.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caesarean sections, phobias and foetal rights.
    Herring J
    Camb Law J; 1997 Nov; 36(3):509-11. PubMed ID: 11657622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judge misled over call for caesarean operation.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7131):574. PubMed ID: 11645034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A child is born in court case over caesarean.
    Terry D
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Dec; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend?
    Michalowski S
    Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caesarean sections by court order.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):770. PubMed ID: 8813981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Feb; 274():457-62. PubMed ID: 12041308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. UK woman wins right to refuse caesarean section.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9114):1499. PubMed ID: 11655349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From cannibalism to caesareans: two conceptions of fundamental rights.
    Hasnas J
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1995; 89(3):900-41. PubMed ID: 11660128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.