These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651514)

  • 21. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand.
    Tateishi SA
    Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Knowledge, practice, and power: court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Irwin S; Jordan B
    Med Anthropol Q; 1987 Sep; 1(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 11659066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical triumph, or surgical rape?
    Hewson B
    Solicit J; 1993 Nov; 137(45):1182-3. PubMed ID: 11656376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trusts face damages after forcing women to have ceasareans.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1480. PubMed ID: 11645058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law.
    McLean SA; Ramsey J
    Med Law Int; 2002; 5(4):239-58. PubMed ID: 14983883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hospital sets policy on pregnant patients' rights.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():B14. PubMed ID: 11646791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Courts acting to force care of the unborn.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court-authorised caesareans: new guidance.
    Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Forcible caesarean: a new direction in British maternity care? Thoughts on the case of Mrs S.
    Crafter H
    Nurs Ethics; 1994 Mar; 1(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 7828056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
    Grant I
    Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
    Rowan C
    Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Caesarean without maternal consent.
    Bewley S
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Dec; No. 84():2. PubMed ID: 11651572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
    Phelan JP
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.