BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

948 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651628)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
    Efron R
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
    US Public Health Service
    Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
    Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
    Steneck NH
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
    Green HP
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.
    Chubin DE
    Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
    Friedman PJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.