These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651647)
1. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A military exception to "informed consent": Doe v. Sullivan. Moran PJ St Johns Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):847-63. PubMed ID: 11652729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. FDA seeks public comment on informed consent rules in combat situations. Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):43. PubMed ID: 11645003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimentation and research. Annas GJ J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Nov; (177):9-47. PubMed ID: 10130675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justiciability--waiving for the flag: should informed consent rules apply in the context of military emergencies? Seftel SB George Washington Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 60(5):1387-435. PubMed ID: 16086522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treating the troops. Howe EG; Martin ED Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):21-4; discussion 24-9. PubMed ID: 2045278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Military medical research: 1. Are there ethical exceptions? Levine C IRB; 1989; 11(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11650244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The law and human experimentation. Simmonds R Univ Ghana Law J; 1973; 10(2):81-102. PubMed ID: 11663022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaccines and the law. Sanzo M Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 19(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11659523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gulf War guinea pigs: is informed consent optional during war? Milner CA J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):199-232. PubMed ID: 9068242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If a subject incurs obligations and carries them out, then consent is a contract: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals (Part II). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Jan; 11(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11653221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of the federal government in protecting citizens from communicable diseases. Morgenstern MS Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1978; 47(4):537-71. PubMed ID: 11664964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Military medical research: 2. Proving the safety and effectiveness of a nerve gas antidote -- a legal view. Cooper RM IRB; 1989; 11(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 11650245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Despite "clinical hold," subjects have right to keep getting experimental drug: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Feb; 11(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The cold war experiments. Budiansky S; Goode EE; Gest T US News World Rep; 1994 Jan; 116(3):32-34, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]