These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651659)

  • 1. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.
    Dowben C
    Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
    Malmquist CP
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
    Herbert W
    Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
    Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
    Dix GE
    St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Stromberg CD; Stone AA
    Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
    Ellis JW
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
    Flaschner FN
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ
    Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.