These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651670)
1. Government regulation of scientific research. Robertson JA Jurimetrics; 1979; 19(4):301-38. PubMed ID: 11651670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why we need a national human experimentation agency. Annas GJ Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):293-302. PubMed ID: 11658184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Childress JF Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Government regulation of research. Seiler LH; Murtha JM Society; 1980; 18(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11661970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders. Hoppe SK Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychosurgery: the law's response. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11661084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed model federal policy for protection of human subjects; response to the First Biennial Report of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(106):20204-17. PubMed ID: 11658721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethical review of medical research: a social movement to protect the interests of research subjects. Osborne LW Aust J Soc Issues; 1984 Aug; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 11649620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical research involving children: some legal and ethical issues. Langer DH Bayl Law Rev; 1984; 36(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J; Levine RJ IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]