121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651673)
1. Alleged neglect of Siamese twins raises ethical issues.
Vogel D; Wood AP
Ob Gyn News; 1981 Sep; 16(18):18. PubMed ID: 11651673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins?
Steinbock B
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated.
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician's dilemma: a doctor's view--what the law should be.
Teel K
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11660887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
Waldman AM
J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
McFadden JP; Hentoff N
Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Little murders.
Patrick JG
New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
Goichman G
South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Case presentation 1 (1991): A newborn with holoprosencephaly -- responses by the Rogue Valley (Medford, Or.) Medical Center's Pediatric/Perinatal Ethics Subcommittee, the Providence (Oakland, Calif.) Hospital's HEC, and the patient's hospital's HEC.
HEC Forum; 1991; 3(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11645688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma.
Shapiro RS
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding whether the baby lives.
Curran M
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():Health Su-17. PubMed ID: 11646285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
Sarno JJ
Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal counts dropped in Siamese twins case.
Wadler J
Washington Post; 1981 Jul; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bedside story.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 11643075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical implications of clinical judgment (the role of the hospital bioethics committee).
Sherman SR
Conn Med; 1984 Feb; 48(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 11644115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
Jakobovits Y
Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
Capron AM
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
