356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651685)
1. Privacy and the right to die.
Riga PJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1981; 26(2):89-126. PubMed ID: 11651685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
Williams JR
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
Hamann AA
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die.
Kirven G
Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Euthanasia: a comparison of the criminal laws of Germany, Switzerland and the United States.
Sayid MD
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):533-62. PubMed ID: 11649614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination.
DiCamillo JA
Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
Solnick PB
Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
Smith SR
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
Haddon PA
Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
