356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651702)
1. Informed consent and the nonautonomous person: the dynamics of dependency relationships.
Dyer AR
IRB; 1982; 4(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A communal model for presumed consent for research on the neurologically vulnerable.
Thomasma DC
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):227-39. PubMed ID: 11654518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IRB intervention in the consent process.
Robertson JA
IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justifying a principle of informed consent: a case study in autonomy-based ethics.
Gunderson M
Public Aff Q; 1990 Jul; 4(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 11659297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects of experimentation with institutionalized mentally disabled subjects.
Laves BS
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1976 Part 2): 592-599, Oct; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 11664683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimenting on human subjects: philosophical perspectives.
Macklin R; Sherwin S
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):434-71. PubMed ID: 11661163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
Brakel SJ
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whose patient is this, anyway?
Grodin MA; Sassower R
IRB; 1987; 9(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient autonomy, paternalism, and the conscientious physician.
Wear S
Theor Med; 1983 Oct; 4(3):253-74. PubMed ID: 11649531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding for others.
Buchanan A; Brock DW
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):17-94. PubMed ID: 11649884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent to participate in research.
Levine RJ
Bioethics Dig; 1977 Mar; 1(11):1-13. PubMed ID: 11664809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decisional capacity, older human research subjects, and IRBs: beyond forms and guidelines.
Kapp MB
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 11657514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing competency in psychiatric patients.
Stanley B; Stanley M
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 11651689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Minors' assent, consent, or dissent to medical research.
Leikin S
IRB; 1993; 15(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 11651566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human experimentation and human rights.
Katz J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Respect for persons and informed consent to participate in research.
Lebacqz K; Levine RJ
Clin Res; 1977 Apr; 25(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 11664815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research: how do we respect autonomy?
Hind M
NATNEWS; 1993 Jan; 2(10 Suppl):S1-5. PubMed ID: 11659672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
