139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651703)
1. Which subjects should an IRB protect? Two moral models.
Lackey DP
IRB; 1982; 4(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 11651703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. For whose protection? Another moral model.
Newton LH
IRB; 1983; 5(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advice on compensation: one IRB's response to DHEW's 'interim final regulation'.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1979 Mar; 1(1):5. PubMed ID: 11662737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: a position paper.
High DM; Whitehouse PJ; Post SG; Berg L
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):66-74. PubMed ID: 11657676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposed revision of the Declaration of Helsinki.
World Medical Association
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; No. 147():18-22. PubMed ID: 11657218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflict of interest in human research ethics.
Jones DJ
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11654611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Americans want to water down Helsinki Declaration.
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Mar; No. 136():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern.
Gordon B; Prentice E
IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The philosopher as insider and outsider: how to advise, compromise, and criticize.
Kamm FM
APA Newsl Philos Med; 1991; 90(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 12085881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research records, litigation, and confidentiality: the case of research on toxic substances.
Brennan TA
IRB; 1983; 5(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 11649524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the practice of offering finder's fees for subject recruitment appropriate? Is the practice widespread or unique to my institution? What is the proper role of the IRB? What is the role of the institution?
IRB; 1990; 12(4):6. PubMed ID: 11651263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Compensation for research injuries. Part I.
Ladimer I
Med Moral Newsl; 1981 Feb; 18(2):5-8. PubMed ID: 11662810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient rights and organization ethics: the Joint Commission perspective.
Schyve PM
Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(2):13-20. PubMed ID: 11654418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
