These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651718)

  • 1. The family with a handicapped newborn.
    Koop CE
    Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 11651718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The handicapped child and his family.
    Koop CE
    Linacre Q; 1981 Feb; 48(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 11662856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical ethics and the stewardship of life.
    Koop CE; Forbes C
    Christ Today; 1978 Dec; 23(6):8-14. PubMed ID: 11663969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns.
    Joseph R
    Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disabled infant's parents win again.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar; 27(10):2, 28. PubMed ID: 11653558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous.
    Klug J
    Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 15-31; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical authority and infanticide.
    Malone PA
    J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yes, the baby should live.
    Davis A
    New Sci; 1985 Oct; 108(1480):54. PubMed ID: 11655713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ideal of community in the work of the President's Commission.
    Burt RA
    Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The handicapped child.
    Gray OP
    Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11651892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More than a matter of parent's versus children's rights: response to Crutchfield.
    Zimmerman SL
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 11651711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ventilator support opposed in some anomalies if parents concur.
    Ob Gyn News; 1980 Apr; 15(8):4-5. PubMed ID: 11663071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.