These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651731)

  • 1. Babies Doe, an analysis and response.
    Gellman M
    Shma; 1984 May; 14(274):106-8. PubMed ID: 11651731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A matter of life and death: Reform Judaism and the defective child.
    Block RA
    J Reform Jud; 1984; 41(4):14-30. PubMed ID: 11651763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y
    Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we let that child die?
    Guentert K; Reich WT
    US Cathol; 1975 Oct; 40(10):6-13. PubMed ID: 11662967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Johnson V
    Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 30(4):925-51. PubMed ID: 11651874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
    McFadden JP; Hentoff N
    Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
    Levant S
    Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beginning of life: discussion.
    Gribetz D
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11644188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life as a principle, not an estimable.
    Feldman DM
    Shma; 1984 May; 14(274):108-9. PubMed ID: 11651732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defective newborns: a right to treatment or a right to die?
    Soskin RM; Vitello SJ
    Amicus; 1979; 4(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 11663094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
    Waldman AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants: legal considerations.
    Robertson JA; Fost N
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 11662998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.