202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651740)
1. The constitutional right to treatment services for the noncommitted mentally disabled.
Esposito VM
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1980; 14(4):675-705. PubMed ID: 11651740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Civil rights of the institutionalized.
Bayh Be
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Feb; 126(30):S1707-47. PubMed ID: 11665218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
Gallo LV
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.
Dowben C
Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
Barnett CF
Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of the mentally ill to receive treatment in the community.
Rapson R
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1980; 16(2):193-268. PubMed ID: 11665276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court considers case on mentally retarded.
Nations Health; 1981 Feb; 11(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 11658338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines.
Wildgen JS
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
Flaschner FN
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
