These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651740)
41. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term. Wing KR; Carman R Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice. Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release. Burnstin SM Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions? Zenoff EH; Zients AB George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions. Kanter AS Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons. Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough. Estacio RA Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment? Bliss TP Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The civilly-committed public mental patient and the right to aftercare. Saphire RB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 4(2):232-95. PubMed ID: 11664639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research. Schaefer GF Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law. Rastatter PC Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The rights of patients in nursing homes: when is there state action? Thomas BM GMU Law Rev; 1982; 5(2):315-37. PubMed ID: 11658685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes". McGovern JJ New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals. Anderson K Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]