BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651744)

  • 1. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
    McFadden JP; Hentoff N
    Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma.
    Shapiro RS
    Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case.
    Baumgardner KL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
    Levant S
    Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
    Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
    Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
    Goichman G
    South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The death of Infant Doe.
    Verhey A
    Reform J; 1982 Jun; 32(6):10-5. PubMed ID: 11651829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When the neonate is defective.
    Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. June 8, 1982, letter of Judge John Baker to Anonymous Person.
    Baker JG
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 11644060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The demise of 'Infant Doe': permitted death gives new life to an old debate.
    Barbash F; Russell C
    Washington Post; 1982 Apr; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.