213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651749)
1. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
Flowers RB
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abraham, Isaac and the state: faith healing and legal intervention.
Abraham HJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1993; 27(5):951-87. PubMed ID: 11652734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. When parents choose prayer over medicine, should courts step in?
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11644130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs.
Probst JE
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "In God we trust": when parents refuse medical treatment for their children based upon their sincere religious beliefs.
Plastine LM
Const Law J; 1993; 3(1):123-60. PubMed ID: 12083094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parental rights and children's best interests: United States.
McBride G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1673-4. PubMed ID: 11642789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding medical care for religious reasons.
Flowers RB
J Relig Health; 1984; 23(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 11658865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of incompetent child: parental wishes and Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11656916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
Wadlington W
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Allocating the costs of parental free exercise: striking a new balance between sincere religious belief and a child's right to medical treatment.
Monopoli PA
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(2):319-52. PubMed ID: 11652074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
Kessler DN
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Jehovah's Witness/blood transfusion dilemma.
O'Donnell TJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1982 Sep; 19(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 11649506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Dubreuil: is an individual's right to refuse a blood transfusion contingent on parental status?
Bamonte JL; Bierman C
Nova Law Rev; 1992; 17(1):517-47. PubMed ID: 11659589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commonwealth v. Twitchell: who owns the child?
Robinson SD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():413-32. PubMed ID: 11645693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die: two sides to suicide.
Chambers RS; Hagstrom R
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 11662358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Laetrile: may the state intervene on behalf of a minor?
Ainsworth MV; Wall T
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1982; 30(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 12083079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wons v. Public Health Trust of Dade County.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 11644332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re McCauley.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Jan; 565():411-4. PubMed ID: 12041203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
