1014 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651755)
41. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Health Sciences Council of Japan adopts guidelines for gene therapy clinical research.
Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):560-3. PubMed ID: 11657358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
Adams MS; Conrad DA
IRB; 1996; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense.
Winter PE
IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Demarcating research and treatment interventions: a case illustration.
Goldberg JL; Phillips JO; Freedman B; Weijer C
IRB; 1992; 14(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 11651393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions.
Hershey N; Cann CI; Rothman KJ
IRB; 1985; 7(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Fetal research II: the ethical questions.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):118-28. PubMed ID: 11663565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH.
Reynolds PD
Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Protecting human subjects of research: an analysis of proposed amendments to HEW policy.
de Sola Pool I
PS (Wash DC); 1979; 12(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 11649394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Ethics of drug experimentation.
Sgreccia E
Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):60-75. PubMed ID: 11653200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
