126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651756)
1. Ambivalent on court role.
Hellegers AE
Ob Gyn News; 1974 Apr; 9(8):38-9. PubMed ID: 11651756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma.
Shapiro RS
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma.
Brant J; McNulty A
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases.
Brant J
Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
Burt RA
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
McFadden JP; Hentoff N
Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When the neonate is defective.
Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
Goichman G
South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Termination of care of newborn infants.
Freeman JM; McDonnell K
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11649665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: the right to choose.
Smith S
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11657338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On letting seriously ill minors die: a review of Louisiana's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 31(1):67-91. PubMed ID: 11651863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. June 8, 1982, letter of Judge John Baker to Anonymous Person.
Baker JG
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 11644060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Little murders.
Patrick JG
New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The law and death--an overview.
Stephan LD; Billings MN
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11662357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The order to treat: judicial intervention in benign neglect of defective infants.
Horan DJ; Guerrini ME
Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11650519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case.
Baumgardner KL
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
