These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651781)

  • 21. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case.
    Baumgardner KL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
    Keyserlingk EW
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
    Riga PJ
    Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical ethics in life and death.
    Thompson R
    Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
    Waldman AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Refusal of lifesaving treatment for minors.
    Annas GJ
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 11651846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
    Levant S
    Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
    Deardorff SE
    Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
    Klinefelter D
    J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities.
    National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
    Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The order to treat: judicial intervention in benign neglect of defective infants.
    Horan DJ; Guerrini ME
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11650519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. June 8, 1982, letter of Judge John Baker to Anonymous Person.
    Baker JG
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 11644060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The rights of minors and the rights of parents revisited, III.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1982 Apr; 46(4):227. PubMed ID: 11643781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
    Webster WL
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.