357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651790)
1. The case for revising our laws on animal experimentation.
Markell DL
Int J Study Anim Probl; 1981; 2(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 11651790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Animals in research: the case for experimentation.
King FA
Psychol Today; 1984 Sep; 18(9):56-8. PubMed ID: 11650675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.
Landsell H
Int J Neurosci; 1988; 42():169-78. PubMed ID: 11650873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research on animals: values, politics, and regulatory reform.
Dresser R
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Jul; 58(5):1147-201. PubMed ID: 11659004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Animal experiments the American way.
Gavaghan H
New Sci; 1992 May; 134(1821):32-6. PubMed ID: 11656146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role and responsibility of industry in research.
Lasagna L
Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):56-9. PubMed ID: 11653199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral community and the responsibility of scientists.
Caplan A
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):78-90. PubMed ID: 11650004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal rights and wrongs.
Stryker J
Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Values, obligations, and virtues: approaches to bio-medical ethics.
Ogletree TW
J Relig Ethics; 1976; 4(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 11663657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Creating a private cause of action against abusive animal research.
McDonald KL
Univ PA Law Rev; 1986; 134(2):399-432. PubMed ID: 11649857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare.
Iglehart JK
Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal models in biomedical research: some epistemological worries.
LaFollette H; Shanks N
Public Aff Q; 1993 Apr; 7(2):113-30. PubMed ID: 11652915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A very strict moral code is needed for the use of and experimentation with drugs.
Pope John Paul II
Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):4, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11653197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Out from under the microscope: a case for laboratory animal rights.
Subar LM
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1987; 1987(2):511-46. PubMed ID: 11659079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. One hundred years of animal welfare regulation and of experiments with animals in Germany, effects and reasons.
Gärtner K
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):106-13. PubMed ID: 11649990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Animal rights and animal experimentation. Implications for physicians.
Gelpi AP
West J Med; 1991 Sep; 155(3):260-2. PubMed ID: 1949772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues.
Hecht EJ
Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judaism and animal experimentation.
Bleich JD
Tradition; 1986; 22(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 11649841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
