These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651793)
1. Arthur's case and the right to life of a Down's syndrome child. Gunn MJ; Smith JC Crim Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 1985():705-15. PubMed ID: 11651793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reg. v. Dr. Leonard Arthur: a "post mortem" analysis. Gerber P Med J Aust; 1982 Apr; 1(7):285-6. PubMed ID: 11643755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A modern myth--that letting die is not the intentional causation of death: some reflections on the trial and acquittal of Dr. Leonard Arthur. Kuhse H J Appl Philos; 1984 Mar; 1(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 11651780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Doctors as murderers. Beynon H Crim Law Rev; 1982 Jan; ():17-28. PubMed ID: 11651827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Of morals and mercy. Barrie H Am J Dis Child; 1982 Dec; 136(12):1100-1. PubMed ID: 12083074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A right to die? Some medico-legal reflection. Ognall H Med Leg J; 1994; 62(Pt. 4):165-79. PubMed ID: 11654337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Courting euthanasia?: Tony Bland and the Law Lords. Keown J Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 11652743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The doctor's dilemma: necessity and the legality of medical intervention. Wilson W; Smith K Med Law Int; 1995; 1(4):387-410. PubMed ID: 11660022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case. Baumgardner KL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia, medical treatment and the mongoloid child: death as a treatment of choice? Horan DJ Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 11660889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What kind of life? What kind of death? An interview with Dr. Henk Prins. Klotzko AJ Bioethics; 1997 Jan; 11(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 11656608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Paediatricians and the law. Roche KP Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Nov; 283(6304):1462-4. PubMed ID: 11653427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-treatment of defective infants: a critical note. Sherlock R Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):185-7. PubMed ID: 11643899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safeguarding euthanasia. Helme T; Padfield N New Law J; 1992 Oct; 142(6573):1335-6. PubMed ID: 11659650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bland: crossing the Rubicon? Finnis JM Law Q Rev; 1993 Jul; 109():329-37. PubMed ID: 11652844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The plight of the genetically handicapped newborn: a comparative analysis. Smith GP Holdsworth Law Rev; 1984; 9(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 12091924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia: law and morality. Key P Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1989; 6(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 11650961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A right to die? Clark Me Newsweek; 1975 Nov; 86(18):58-60+. PubMed ID: 11664452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]