187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651816)
1. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Johnson v. Sullivan.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 11644472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
Portela C
Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies.
Hall HB
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
Conley JJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die.
Kamen A
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Johnson v. Thompson.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 971():1487-99. PubMed ID: 11648605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
Crossley MA
Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
McFadden JP; Hentoff N
Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On letting some babies die.
Smith DH
Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Termination of care of newborn infants.
Freeman JM; McDonnell K
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11649665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Life-and-death lottery in the nursery.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Apr; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants: legal considerations.
Robertson JA; Fost N
J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 11662998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
