187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651816)
21. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
Otten M
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
Cooper R
Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medical authority and infanticide.
Malone PA
J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated.
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Joining in life and death: on separating the Lakeberg twins.
Dougherty CJ
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11653280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of government in protecting children with disabilities.
Anderson CA
Linacre Q; 1991 Aug; 58(3):69-78. PubMed ID: 11652851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns.
Joseph R
Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Little murders.
Patrick JG
New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. More than a matter of parent's versus children's rights: response to Crutchfield.
Zimmerman SL
Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 11651711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Critical issues debates: intervention for infants with fatal heart disease, xenografting, and brain death criteria for anencephalic infants. Debate I. Resolved: a fetus or infant diagnosed with fatal heart disease should be referred for transplantation or palliative surgery.
Bailey LL; Norwood W; Allan LD
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1993; 12(6 pt. 2):S351-60. PubMed ID: 11660029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Neonatal intensive care and the premature infant: criteria for intervention.
Freund B
Humane Med; 1993 Oct; 9(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 11654100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Iafelice by Iafelice v. Zarafu.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 11644328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The order to treat: judicial intervention in benign neglect of defective infants.
Horan DJ; Guerrini ME
Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11650519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: the right to choose.
Smith S
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11657338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Spina bifida: the surgeon's responsibility.
Eckstein H
Doc Med Ethics; 1974 Apr 1974, 4 p 3; No():. PubMed ID: 11662938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. When the neonate is defective.
Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
