These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651816)
41. High risk infants: thirty years of intensive care. Harris CH Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11653275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: substituted judgment, informed consent, and the Quinlan decision. Sargeant KJ Gonzaga Law Rev; 1978; 13(3):781-811. PubMed ID: 11664980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Tragedies and medical choices. Lammers SE Christ Century; 1993 Sep 8-15; 110(25):845-6. PubMed ID: 11660055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Reducing suffering and ensuring beneficial outcomes for neonates: an ethical perspective. Brodeur D Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11653274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma. Brant J; McNulty A Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions. Rhoden NK Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case. Baumgardner KL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Surgery and the rights of children with handicaps. Kugel RB N Y Med Q; 1985; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11650764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Rationing expensive lifesaving medical treatments. Mehlman MJ Wis L Rev; 1985; 1985(2):239-303. PubMed ID: 11658831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of seriously ill newborns. Johnson V Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 30(4):925-51. PubMed ID: 11651874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Hospital bioethics: a beginning knowledge base for the neonatal social worker. Silverman E Soc Work; 1992 Mar; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11642999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Early management and decision-making for the treatment of myelomeningocele at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: observations clinical and ethical. Allsopp ME Linacre Q; 1986 Feb; 53(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 11650727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Informed consent as a parent involvement model in the NICU. Luckner KR; Weinfeld IJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Euthanasia questions stir new debate. Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The ultimate parental nightmare: should our 'bad baby' live or die? Lyon J Washington Post; 1985 Feb; ():C1, C2. PubMed ID: 11646289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins? Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]