These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651817)
1. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the matter of George Clark. Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die? Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients. Oxman ML J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act. New Jersey N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center. Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision on feeding tube sought in test case. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 May; 28(19):1, 33-34. PubMed ID: 11653667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical guidelines for treatment of the dying elderly. Schostak Z J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1991; No. 22():62-86. PubMed ID: 11659390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paul E. Brophy is dead at 49; tested rule on right to die. N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A legal test of the right to die. Malcolm AH N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds. Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking. Quinn KP Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Feenan D J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Catholic tradition on the use of nutrition and fluids. Paris JJ; McCormick RA America (NY); 1987 May; 156(17):356-61. PubMed ID: 11658928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life? Cerminara KL Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]