243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651817)
1. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the matter of George Clark.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die?
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision on feeding tube sought in test case.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 May; 28(19):1, 33-34. PubMed ID: 11653667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical guidelines for treatment of the dying elderly.
Schostak Z
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1991; No. 22():62-86. PubMed ID: 11659390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paul E. Brophy is dead at 49; tested rule on right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A legal test of the right to die.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds.
Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF
Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
Quinn KP
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
Hamann AA
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Catholic tradition on the use of nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; McCormick RA
America (NY); 1987 May; 156(17):356-61. PubMed ID: 11658928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
