These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651839)
1. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions. Gunty S Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall. Sewell CC; Wetterer MA KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980). Brath MS Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Poor women get word on health from Court. Mann J Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11647332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Hyde Amendment: an infringement upon the free exercise clause? Biskin JC Rutgers Law Rev; 1981; 33(4):1054-75. PubMed ID: 11655472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade. Brock VM Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]