These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651847)
1. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. Curry RE J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():416-75. PubMed ID: 12041275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983). Crusius CJ Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The legacy of Justice William Brennan. Glendon MA; Treene EW Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 11660508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. High court sets review on abortion. Barbash F Washington Post; 1982 May; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.: stare decisis prevails, but for how long? Prieto P Univ Miami Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 38(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 11655794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 655():848-78. PubMed ID: 11648459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutionality of a city ordinance regulating the performance of abortion (city of Akron v. Akron Center of Reproductive Health). US Supreme Court, Decision Nos. 81746, 811172, June 15, 1983 (Supreme Court Reporter = S.Ct. 103 (1983, 2481-2517). Med Law; 1985; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 4038540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last? Casurella JG; Schrock CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The viability of the trimester approach. Calder KA Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion: the Court's intellectual scandal. Will GF Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():B7. PubMed ID: 11647350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion: a new round. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--abortion--a requirement that "all" second trimester abortions shall be performed in a hospital is unconstitutional--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 51 U.S.L.W. 4767 (June 15, 1983). Colbert J Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1983 Fall-1984 Spring; 9(1-2):144-65. PubMed ID: 11655796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Akron Center v. City of Akron. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jun; 651():1198-217. PubMed ID: 11648467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Right of privacy--mandatory hospitalization for all second trimester abortions invalidated as not being reasonably related to maternal health--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 103 S.Ct. 2481 (1983). Lim DG Santa Clara Law Rev; 1984; 24(3):789-801. PubMed ID: 11655804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]