These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651857)
1. Some moral problems of the damaged neonate. Hoaglund J Philos Context; 1984; 14():19-28. PubMed ID: 11651857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Life and death and the handicapped newborn. Koop CE Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of government in protecting children with disabilities. Anderson CA Linacre Q; 1991 Aug; 58(3):69-78. PubMed ID: 11652851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma. Jakobovits Y Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Saving defective infants: options for life or death. Paris JJ; McCormick RA America (NY); 1983 Apr; 148(16):313-7. PubMed ID: 11658385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whatever may happen to Baby Jane. Robinson DN Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11646272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Two doctors take controversial stand on feeding those near death. Weiser B Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11646362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton. Klinefelter D J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Baby Doe. Singer P; Kuhse H New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding treatment from newborns with severe birth defects. Freeman JM; Fletcher AB; Doudera AE Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):98, 142-143. PubMed ID: 11643894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants. Smith SR NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Meese approved intervention in baby case. Barringer F Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law. Johnstone BV Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]