These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
803 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651918)
1. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment. Mead AP Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Model guidelines for the development of institutional policy on the termination of life support and commentary: Part I. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1989; 3(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. All's well that ends well: toward a policy of assisted rational suicide or merely enlightened self determination? Smith GP Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):275-419. PubMed ID: 11650248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care. Franklin C; Weil MH Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Dying patients: who's in control? Childress JF Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 11644392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die. Zaremba JF Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Active and passive euthanasia--ten years into the debate. Kuhse H Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 11649796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Hastings Center and euthanasia. Richter R Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 11649267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act. New Jersey N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care. Dorff EN Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Euthanasia and law reform. Samek R Ottawa Law Rev; 1984; 17(1):86-115. PubMed ID: 11649198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Active euthanasia: can it be justified? Molenda FA Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withholding and withdrawing life support. Raffin TA Hosp Pract; 1991 Mar; 26(3):133-136, 140-141, 145. PubMed ID: 11652589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What role for surrogate decision makers? Hubbard H Origins; 1993 Feb; 22(34):576-9. PubMed ID: 11652129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]