These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651956)

  • 1. The abortion struggle in America.
    Warren MA
    Bioethics; 1989 Oct; 3(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 11651956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
    Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Constitution and abortion.
    Campbell A
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic.
    George J
    Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking aim at Roe v. Wade.
    Gorney C
    Washington Post; 1989 Apr; ():18-26, 42-44. PubMed ID: 11655908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
    Dworkin R
    Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade.
    Ginsburg RB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.