162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651969)
1. Continuing or discontinuing treatment: ethical criteria.
SSM Health Care System, et al
Origins; 1989 Sep; 19(17):279-86. PubMed ID: 11651969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of families in medical decisions.
Minow M
Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Chicago opinion of marginal value.
Parnisari EP
Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court to rule on right to die in case of brain injury victim.
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying.
Feenan D
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Responses to "From ethical dilemma to hospital policy.
Bader D; Miles J
Health Prog; 1991 Nov; 72(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11645705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The status of the permanently unconscious: "You call that living?
Gold JA
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1087-98. PubMed ID: 11651436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
Prygoski PJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
