327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651992)
1. Privacy and personhood revisited: a new framework for substitute decisionmaking for the incompetent, incurably ill adult.
Fentiman LC
George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Mar; 57(4):801-48. PubMed ID: 11651992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
Burch TJ
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Therefore choose death?
Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives.
Cox SE
N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
