These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11652022)
1. The sanctity of life and substituted judgement: the case of Baby J. Hornett SI Ethics Med; 1991; 7(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants. Smith SR NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Nancy Cruzan case. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re J (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1990 Oct; [1990] 3():930-45. PubMed ID: 11648249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis. Wood AT St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The outer limits of parental autonomy: withholding medical treatment from children. Vorys YV Ohio State Law J; 1981; 43(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 11658709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sanctity of life, quality of life, and social justice. Cahill LS Theol Stud; 1987 Mar; 48():105-23. PubMed ID: 11659308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of seriously ill newborns. Johnson V Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 30(4):925-51. PubMed ID: 11651874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Appeal Court supports doctors' decision not to treat. Dyer C BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6841):1527-8. PubMed ID: 11643008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die. Zaremba JF Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients. Francis LP Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die (II). Koop CE Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(2):33-58. PubMed ID: 11662995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care. Dorff EN Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities. HarveyParedes T SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46(3):805-40. PubMed ID: 11659757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]